To start a New Thread about apostrophe use or abuse CLICK HERE
A chance for you to tell our other visitors about examples of apostrophe abuse that you have seen.
Opinions expressed on this APS Forum are those of the writers alone and not necessarily the views of the APS or its Chairman.
Please keep your entries short and to the point and include your country location in your Profile.
Multiple entries, advertisements, entries from invalid email addresses, 'trolls', entries in languages other than English, spam and threads or messages containing defamatory comments or offensive words or images will be removed without warning. Offenders will be banned from the Forum.
Please use this Message Board only for observations or problems to do with the use of the apostrophe
For other English language problems please post your message HERE
If it was a singular lady, the convention would be the lady's glasses. If the ladies were plural, it would be ladies' glasses.
As you wouldn't be able to distinguish the two in spoken English, I argue that we shouldn't bother to use the apostrophe to distinguish the written forms of the possessive.
But in this respect, I believe I'm in a minority of one: at least on this forum.
As you wouldn't be able to distinguish the two in spoken English, I argue that we shouldn't bother to use the apostrophe to distinguish the written forms of the possessive.
But in this respect, I believe I'm in a minority of one: at least on this forum.
Yes, you are!
And just what spelling would you use?
ladies ladys ladees ???
Keep in mind that your writing shouldn't have stumbling blocks for your reader.
Ambiguous post of mine: apologies. Yes of course you would always be able to distinguish by context in verbal and written forms.
I would end up distinguishing the singular or plural forms of the written words too as i would respect the conventional spelling: ladys and ladies, though not the apostrophisation.
But I admit this is unlikly to supplant the existing convention.