APS Message Forum The Apostrophe Protection Society If you are an existing member: Please login below Otherwise, please Register. Login using your social network or forum account: Keep me logged in Username: Password:

The Apostrophe Protection Society Forum [Back to the main APS website] To start a New Thread about apostrophe use or abuse CLICK HERE

A chance for you to tell our other visitors about examples of apostrophe abuse that you have seen.

Opinions expressed on this APS Forum are those of the writers alone and not necessarily the views of the APS or its Chairman.

Please keep your entries short and to the point and include your country location in your Profile.

Multiple entries, advertisements, entries from invalid email addresses, 'trolls', entries in languages other than English, spam and threads or messages containing defamatory comments or offensive words or images will be removed without warning. Offenders will be banned from the Forum.

For other English language problems please post your message HERE

APS Message Forum :: General :: Apostrophe Use & Abuse :: Contraction or not at all? Author Topic: Contraction or not at all? (Read 198 times) whoisit New Member member is offline Joined: Apr 2012 Gender: Male Posts: 4 Contraction or not at all? « Thread Started on May 4, 2012, 1:48pm » Hi Again Every month we have a list of people who Did Not Attend and we print out, for example, DNA's 96. Is the apostrophe right for a contraction of the word Attends? Or should it just be DNAs 96 Thanks for looking Link to Post - Back to Top   Logged hubertus Senior Member member is offline Joined: Jan 2012 Gender: Male Posts: 458 Location: W. Yorkshire, England Re: Contraction or not at all? « Reply #1 on May 4, 2012, 6:15pm » Plural words simply take s with no apostrophe: DNAs. It's not a contraction, it's an abbrieviation. Convention has it that we don't use the apostrophe for abbrieviations. Also, the full stop between abbrieviations has gone out of favour. For instance, the former P.T.O., e.g. and so on. Hence no D.N.A. « Last Edit: May 7, 2012, 8:42pm by hubertus » Link to Post - Back to Top   Logged Tone Advanced Member member is offline "I don't do Happy." Joined: Feb 2009 Gender: Female Posts: 909 Location: West of London (ex-Hampshire) Re: Contraction or not at all? « Reply #2 on May 4, 2012, 8:52pm » Were you back in the 1960's (like that) you would be quite "normal" to use the apostrophe. Now, in the 2110s, you would be either out-of-date (like me), or judged to be "wrong" by many ordinary people as well as the APS "official line". Tone Link to Post - Back to Top   Logged John (Forum Admin) Administrator APS Forum Administrator & Webmaster member is offline John Hale, APS Forum Administrator & Webmaster Joined: Feb 2009 Gender: Male Posts: 132 Location: South Dorset, UK Re: Contraction or not at all? « Reply #3 on May 5, 2012, 12:27am » May 4, 2012, 6:15pm, hubertus wrote: Also, the full stop between abbrieviations has gone out of favour. For instance, the former P.T.O., e.g. and so on. Hence no D.N.A. I worked for BBC Television in London for 31 years and at the start of my time there in 1964 all the B.B.C. vehicles had very prominent full stops after each letter as shown here. They were everywhere within the Corporation - and even appeared on the first transmitted Test Cards as "B.B.C. Television Service". See here: http://txlib.mb21.co.uk/main.php?g2_itemId=750 I think the cut-backs killed them off! Link to Post - Back to Top   Logged John Hale (APS Forum Administrator & Webmaster) Dave Advanced Member member is offline Joined: Feb 2009 Gender: Male Posts: 702 Location: San Jose, CA Re: Contraction or not at all? « Reply #4 on May 5, 2012, 2:35am » Saving ink? Link to Post - Back to Top   Logged Dave John (Forum Admin) Administrator APS Forum Administrator & Webmaster member is offline John Hale, APS Forum Administrator & Webmaster Joined: Feb 2009 Gender: Male Posts: 132 Location: South Dorset, UK Re: Contraction or not at all? « Reply #5 on May 5, 2012, 6:51pm » May 5, 2012, 2:35am, Dave wrote: Saving ink? Yep! Think so. At the same time they stopped printing "Property of the B.B.C." on every sheet of [hard] toilet paper! Link to Post - Back to Top   Logged John Hale (APS Forum Administrator & Webmaster) Tone Advanced Member member is offline "I don't do Happy." Joined: Feb 2009 Gender: Female Posts: 909 Location: West of London (ex-Hampshire) Re: Contraction or not at all? « Reply #6 on May 5, 2012, 8:28pm » >I worked for BBC Television in London for 31 years and at the start of my time there in 1964 all the B.B.C. vehicles had very prominent full stops < I was with G.E.C. / G E C in the '60s and they changed it from G.E.C. to the dotless version. It was said that Arnold (Weinstock) had decreed it. But I've still got (somewhere) an original plastic logo badge with the dots thereon. Tone « Last Edit: May 5, 2012, 8:29pm by Tone » Link to Post - Back to Top   Logged whoisit New Member member is offline Joined: Apr 2012 Gender: Male Posts: 4 Re: Contraction or not at all? « Reply #7 on May 6, 2012, 10:07am » Thanks everyone for the informative and humorous replies I guess from now on it's DNAs Link to Post - Back to Top   Logged Forum Jump--------------------» Home--------------------» General--------------------- Apostrophe Use & Abuse --- Welcome, APS Policy & Forum News- Other English Language Problems

Where are APS Forum users located?
Please click small map below to find out ...

If you are interested in a discussion area on all aspects of the use of English you may wish to visit this Forum.

We would like to thank members who generously donate $7 per month to keep this Forum ad-free by clicking the link below.

Click Here To Make This Board Ad-Free

This Board Hosted For FREE By ProBoards
Get Your Own Free Message Boards & Free Forums!
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Notice | FTC Disclosure | Report Abuse | Mobile